Opinion article by: Nathalia Rios Ballesteros* (nriosba@eafit.edu.co)
Economics student at Universidad EAFIT, Colombia.
Global
capitalism has taken over the current economic field. Over the last two
decades, terms such as ‘globalization’, ‘internationalization’ and ‘international free trade’ have emerged and have
jointly given rise to a new line of research and a new ‘form of trade’ which has
increased greatly in importance nowadays: Global Value Chains (GVCs). According to Gereffi (2003) a value chain is
the range of activities –understood as a set of process that take place
transnationally - involved in the design, production and marketing of a product
before it is turn into a final good; it is ‘the functional integration and
co-ordination of internationally dispersed activities’’ (Gereffi 1999: 41)
Within this
broad framework; the growing integration of the global economy posed by the
implementation of the GVCs in the various sectors of the economy, has provided
the opportunity for substantial economic and income growth, creating and
promoting significant opportunities for developing countries and regions as a
way to potentially increase the rate and scope of industrial growth and the
upgrading of their manufacturing and service activities as well as a way for addressing
the poverty and inequality inherent to its internal situation.
However, at
the same time, GVCs carry along not only positive but also negative attributes
for these countries. As it was stated by the UNCTAD WIR for 2013, even though developing
countries are increasingly becoming active participants of GVCs and thus
gaining significant improvements in living standards and domestic value added
in their exports - higher contribution to countries’ GDP- through it, it still remains
a long way towards equity in contrast with developed economies. In this sense, as
global trade grows, developed economies appear to increase import dependence
for exports, allowing developing countries to add disproportionately to their
domestic value; in a nutshell, innovation activities tend to attract higher
incomes and continue to be concentrated in the developed countries.
In this
context, it seems like the impact of GVCs on inequality is perhaps a complex
and wide reality, but unraveling this ‘complexity’ is the key challenge for all
developing economies in order to succeed in their path towards integral growth
and economic development. What matters then, is how producers – whether firms,
regions or countries – become active participants of the global economy and
GVCs to narrow this disparity. Hence, there is a need to manage and control the
mode of insertion into this ‘plural economy’, to ensure that incomes are not
reduced or further transferred to developed countries. Thus, identifying the
circumstances which enable developing countries to extend and transform their
production capabilities into innovation capabilities along with profit
maximization, acquisition of competitive and comparative advantage, reduction of
reliance on developed countries to create own-domestic value added and the diversification
and expansion of the range of production, which implies exploring other
economic sector and fields, rather than sticking into the one that provides the
least profit range: the primary sector, can become useful strategies to forge
the way to a true global economy.
References:
Gereffi, G., 1999, ‘International trade and industrial upgrading in the
apparel commodity chain’, Journal of International Economics, Vol 48, No 1, pp
37-70.
No comments:
Post a Comment